Kajian Teologis tentang Kematian menurut Lukas 16:19–31 dan Implikasinya bagi Umat Percaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53827/lz.v9i1.31Kata Kunci:
teologi kematian; Lukas 16:19–31; analisis naratif; kehidupan setelah kematianAbstrak
Artikel ini mengkaji makna teologis kematian dan kehidupan setelah kematian berdasarkan perumpamaan orang kaya dan Lazarus dalam Lukas 16:19–31. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan naratif-teologis yang memperhatikan konteks sosial-historis, tulisan ini menemukan bahwa kematian bukanlah akhir eksistensi, melainkan pintu gerbang menuju realitas kekal yang ditentukan oleh sikap hidup manusia terhadap Allah dan sesama. Perumpamaan ini menegaskan keadilan ilahi, finalitas kondisi pascakematian, serta pentingnya pertobatan yang didasarkan pada kesaksian Kitab Suci. Di samping itu, perumpamaan ini mengandung seruan etis bagi umat percaya masa kini untuk menjalani kehidupan dengan tanggung jawab moral dan sosial, serta tidak hanya mengandalkan simbol-simbol religius lahiriah. Penelitian ini menawarkan kontribusi terhadap studi teologi Perjanjian Baru dan memberikan refleksi teologis yang relevan bagi kehidupan umat Kristen dalam menghadapi kematian, menghidupi iman, dan mengupayakan keadilan sosial.
Referensi
Barclay, William. The Parables of Jesus. Westminster John Knox Press, 1999.
Bawulski, Shawn. “Annihilationism, Traditionalism, and the Problem of Hell.” Philosophia Christi 12, no. 1 (2010): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.5840/pc20101215.
Berchie, Daniel, and Samson Dakio. “Luke 16:19–31: Intermediate State of the Soul.” Philosophy Study 5, no. 2 (February 28, 2015). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2015.02.007.
Bredenhof, Reuben. “Looking for Lazarus: Assigning Meaning to the Poor Man in Luke 16.19–31.” New Testament Studies 66, no. 1 (January 3, 2020): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688519000328.
Brenton, L. C. L. Septuagint with Apocrypha. Hendrickson Publishers, 1986.
Brink, Gijsbert van den. “HUMAN DEATH IN THEOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY: DISAMBIGUATING (IM)MORTALITY AS ECUMENICAL SOLUTION.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 57, no. 4 (December 2, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12824.
Broussard, Karlo. Purgatory Is for Real: Good News about the Afterlife for Those Who Aren’t Perfect yet. Catholic Answers Press, 2020.
Daniel, Angely, and Deflit Dujerslaim Lilo. “HADES MENURUT KITAB LUKAS 16:19–31 DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI HIDUP ORANG PERCAYA.” Voice of HAMI: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen 5, no. 1 (August 31, 2022): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.59830/voh.v5i1.43.
Davis, Lilly Hannah. “The Independent Works of Luke: Further Evidence on the Early Christian Reception of Luke and Acts.” The Journal of Theological Studies 75, no. 2 (November 18, 2024): 356–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flae043.
Dinkler, Michal Beth. “A New Formalist Approach to Narrative Christology: Returning to the Structure of the Synoptic Gospels.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 73, no. 1 (February 28, 2017). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i1.4801.
Etukumana, Godwin A. “Servant-Leadership as a Model for Christian Community: A Subversive Rhetoric and Ideology in Luke 22:23–27.” Religions 15, no. 4 (March 24, 2024): 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040391.
Gozali, M. C., D. Bastanta, and P. Tambunan. “Metode Penafsiran Narasi Injil Markus.” KERUGMA: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen 4, no. 2 (2022): 71–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2500/kerugma.v4i2.85.
Green, J. B. Luke as Narrative Theologian: Texts and Topics. Mohr Siebeck, 2020.
Kimosop, Ezekiel. “The Impact of Moral Discretions on the Afterlife – A Theological Reflection on the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus in Luke 16:19-31.” Journal of Sociology, Psychology and Religious 4, no. 2 (May 4, 2024): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.70619/vol4iss2pp35-45.
Mawikere, Marde Christian Stenly, and Sudiria Hura. “Diskursus Kritik Naratif Sebagai Metode Hermeneutis Biblis Menurut Kajian Teolog Biblika.” DA’AT : Jurnal Teologi Kristen 4, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 29–55. https://doi.org/10.51667/djtk.v4i1.1031.
Miller, Chris, and Lori G. Beaman. “Nonreligious Afterlife: Emerging Understandings of Death and Dying.” Religions 15, no. 1 (January 13, 2024): 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010104.
Rosenfeld, B. Z., and H. Perlmutter. “The Attitude to Poverty and the Poor in Early Rabbinic Sources (70-250 Ce).” Journal for the Study of Judaism 47, no. 3 (September 28, 2016): 411–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700631-12340454.
Ryu, Ho-Seung. “Why Was the Rich Man Dressed in Purple Unable to Go into Abraham’s Bosom? : A Socio-Political-Economic-Cultural Interpretation on Luke 16:19-31.” Journal of Biblical Text Research 37 (October 31, 2015): 152–72. https://doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2015.10.37.152.
Somov, Alexey, and Vitaly Voinov. “‘Abraham’s Bosom’ (Luke 16:22–23) as a Key Metaphor in the Overall Composition of the Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 79, no. 4 (2017): 615–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2017.0081.
Szkredka, Sławomir. “Postmortem Punishment in the Parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16:19-31): Between Coherence and Indeterminacy of Luke’s Eschatology.” Verbum Vitae 36 (December 27, 2019): 109–32. https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.4832.
Thayer, J. Henry, and C. Gottlob Wilke. Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Coded with Strong’s Concordance Numbers. Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.
Tobing, Oscard L. “Contribution and Reduction of Narrative Theology to Biblical Hermeneutics in the Postmodern Era.” Veritas: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pelayanan 20, no. 2 (December 23, 2021): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v20i2.478.
Yoder, Keith L. “In the Bosom of Abraham.” Novum Testamentum 62, no. 1 (December 13, 2019): 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341650.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Andrew Lucas Tjong , Atila Zalukhu
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
